Discussing Torah matters because the Torah matters

Leviticus 19:18

Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the LORD.


The difference between these has been explained as follows:

Revenge-seeking:
You ask your co-worker for a dollar. He says no. One week later, your co-worker asks you for a dollar. You say, “Absolutely not!”


Grudge-bearing:
You ask your co-worker for a dollar. He says no. One week later, your co-worker asks you for a dollar. You say, “Absolutely! I’m not you.”

Striking Down the Enemy

In the wilderness, the tempter came and said to Jesus, “If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.” 

Jesus answered the enemy with a verse from Deuteronomy: “It is written, ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God.’” (Quoting Deuteronomy 8:3)

The devil then took Him into Jerusalem and had Him stand on the pinnacle of the temple, and said to Him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down...”

Jesus answered the enemy with a verse from Deuteronomy: “It is written, ‘You shall not put the Lord your God to the test.’” (Quoting Deuteronomy 6:16)

The enemy took Him to a very high mountain and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory, and said to Him, “All these things I will give You, if You fall down and worship me.”

Jesus answered the enemy with a verse from Deuteronomy: “It is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and serve Him only.” (Quoting Deuteronomy 6:13)

Jesus relied on the Torah to do battle with the devil. There are five books in the Torah He could have chosen from, but one was enough to put down the enemy.

When David went against Goliath, the account says that David “chose five smooth stones from the brook and put them in his shepherd’s pouch. His sling was in his hand, and he approached the Philistine. . .David ran quickly toward the battle line to meet the Philistine. David put his hand in his bag and took out a stone and slung it and struck the Philistine on his forehead. The stone sank into his forehead, and he fell on his face to the ground.” (1 Samuel 17:40,48,49)

David relied on these stones to do battle with Goliath. There were five stones in his bag he could have chosen from, but one was enough to put down the enemy

It’s interesting though, because the battle wasn’t quite finished for either David or Jesus. Luke 4:13 tells us that “when the devil had finished every temptation, he left Jesus until an opportune time. This opportune time came later, when Jesus hung on the cross. Speaking through those passing by, Satan called out, “If you are the Son of God, come down from that cross!” This is the fourth great temptation that tends to be overlooked, but it goes to show that the showdown wasn’t quite over between Jesus and the tempter.

Neither was it over between David and Goliath. After dropping him with a stone, David stands over Goliath and draws Goliath’s sword out of its sheath. Using Goliath’s own instrument against him, David severs Goliath’s head from his body. 

Hanging on the cross, Jesus looks down at the enemy. Before this, He had struck down the devil with a book, but now Jesus will use something else to finalize the defeat. Death is taken up in the hands of Jesus. Using the devil’s own instrument against him, Jesus dies on the cross––and with that death, He crushes the serpent’s head.

Boiling Goats

Do not boil a young goat in its mother’s milk.

This law is repeated three times in the Torah: Exodus 23:19, Exodus 34:26, and Deuteronomy 14:21. The spiritual principle that shoulders this law is as follows:

A mother’s milk is designed to give life. It’s intended to nourish the young goat. If we boil the young goat in this milk, we are taking something that is meant for life but using it as a means for death. Gods law prohibits such a corruption. 

I remember my dad talking about a certain experience he went through at a large company he used to work for. He told me that higher management had devised a number system meant to measure and reward productive labor. The higher one’s numbers, the more bonus-eligible a worker would become. However, when this number system was implemented, an unexpected thing happened. Lower management noticed that my dad’s numbers were high, so they started to assign him the arduous jobs, one after another. Meanwhile, those workers who tended to slack off were consistently assigned the easiest jobs available. Lower management lessened the likelihood of headaches this way. The net effect, though, was that my dad was being punished for being productive.

Lower management failed to realize they were boiling a young goat in its mother’s milk. They were taking something meant for life (reward) and using it to bring death (hardship) to the vulnerable party. They were transgressing the principle that is expressed by this very relevant commandment.

No Oxen Required

We’ve established that the spiritual realm is primary, and the physical realm is secondary. As such, all physical truth has its source in the spiritual domain, that world from which God spoke forth physical creation. Let’s continue to develop this idea because once it clicked for me, the Torah opened up in so many ways. What I once saw as an irrelevant commandment related to agriculture became an eternal truth and a guiding principle as relevant and applicable to my life as to any ancient Israelite.  

Speaking of the Heavenly Father, Rabbi Akiva Tatz writes: “The Creator is completely transcendent, and utterly incorporeal. He has no body, no tangible aspect, and no parts. The problem, however, is that the Torah speaks of God as if He were physical. Many verses speak of God’s hand, His arm, His eyes, and many other such attributes. “With a mighty hand and an outstretched arm;” “The eyes of God...are upon it (the land of Israel). 

At first glance it seems that the Torah speaks this way because we cannot understand any other method of expression; we can understand only those thing which are part of our world. We live in a finite, differentiated world; we are familiar with beings who have hands, eyes, and feet. Therefore the Torah speaks to us in terms which are familiar to us.  Of course, we understand that beyond the metaphor, beyond the borrowed language, there is much more. The finite words of Torah clothe endless layers of deeper meaning; the outer layer is only the vehicle, so to speak, for the deeper meaning. But since abstraction cannot be expressed except through concrete terms, the Torah speaks in those concrete terms which are familiar to us. 

“However, deeper thought will show that this cannot be correct. If the Torah is using human terms as analogy, we are faced with a major difficulty. How can the Torah speak in terms which are not strictly true? We know that the Torah is true in the very deepest sense possible; every nuance within the Torah must be true. Since the Torah is none other than God speaking, even the outermost layers of its expression must be absolutely accurate and true. Analogies and metaphors may be useful, but they are not true in themselves. . .If God does not really have a hand, but the Torah says He does because we are limited to familiar concepts, is this not in some sense inaccurate, or false? Is untruth justified because we cannot hear truth? Surely not!

“We shall need to seek more deeply. There is a more accurate answer to our question, and one who hears it will find his perception of reality forever changed. 

How can God have a real hand? Surely a real hand is finite, physical––a contradiction to the infinite Oneness of the Creator? Surely the Divine hand must be some sort of analogy? But the secret which answers our question is this: God’s hand is a real hand and our human hand is an analogy! When the Torah talks of the Divine hand, it is referring to that which is real in the deepest sense; that which is infinite and in no contradiction to the absolute Oneness of the Creator. God indeed has a hand, but that hand transcends human understanding no less than any other Divine attribute which is expressed in Torah, and no less than what we refer to as God Himself. 

So we can say that God has a hand, but we cannot understand what that means. And that is exactly the point: the reason that we have been created with hands is so that we can begin to understand! We possess parts, components, differentiated aspects of our bodies so that we can begin to fathom the meaning of these things at their root. We are the analogy! God wants us to begin to understand Him; part of the purpose of learning Torah is to begin to understand what a human can understand of the Divine; and therefore we are given the tangible tools that we need.


So look at your hand. In one sense, that is not a hand. That is an illustration of what God wants you to think about whenever He talks about His hand! Because “we are the analogy.” This is the point Rabbi Tatz is making, and it’s an amazing thing to consider! 

It’s been explained to me this way: Imagine you’re an Israelite in ancient Israel. You’re walking down the road and you see that your neighbor’s oxen are stuck in a ditch. You think to yourself, “Okay, God handed down His Word to teach me how to respond to this real life situation. I need to help my neighbor’s oxen out of the ditch.” Yes, this is true; but to some degree, this is upside-down thinking. Actually, God handed down the situation so that you would be able to understand His Word! The oxen, the cart, the neighbor, the ditch––God needed all of these aspects to teach you the eternal reality that He really wanted you to know! Love. Patience. Kindness. Goodness. Real things. Spiritual things. Primary things. The situation was merely a parable. 

As I mentioned earlier, what I once saw as an irrelevant commandment related to agriculture became an eternal truth and a guiding principle as relevant and applicable to my life as to any ancient Israelite. I just had to realize that God, on one level, created this world as a parable to teach us about the world to come. So if we encounter a commandment in the Torah and sense no deeper meaning, then we’ve missed it. It’s like Jesus said of those who didn’t understand His parables: “Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand.” The same can be said of those who toss aside God’s directives thinking they are irrelevant to modern life.

Take for instance this commandment: “Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain.” A person today may read this and think, “Well I don’t own an ox, so this commandment doesn’t apply to me.” But stop and consider it as a parable, as an analogy expressing higher truth. Paul does exactly this, saying: “The elders who rule well are to be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching, for Scripture says ‘You shall not muzzle the ox while it is threshing’” (1 Timothy 5:17-18). Paul gets the parable. He understands its meaning. It’s about more than an ox. God uses the ox and the grain and the treading to communicate a spiritual principle: those who work for you deserve in return some of the blessing derived from their efforts. Once you understand that this is what it is all about, you realize there are endless applications for this commandment in today’s modern life––no oxen required. It applies to you even if you do not own an ox.

Any yet, the oxen were required to communicate the real part. That is, the truth.

Nature as a Language

God could’ve willed the universe into existence. But as you know, He didn’t.
Genesis 1 is clear: He created the universe with words. He spoke forth creation.
As speaking beings made in Gods image, we comprehend words. Words are symbols. 

It goes that we can engage the natural world as a language once we realize that everything in it is a symbol communicating deeper truth, a construct harboring inner meaning. 

For a second, take a look at the following image and tell me, what is this?


Did you say its a combination of black lines on white space? 
Did you say its a three-letter word with two consonants and a vowel?
Or did you say it’s a person who walks and talks and fails to put the toilet seat down?

It’s all three! And this is what’s so fascinating about language. We can extract levels of meaning from something that is physically no more than a combination of black lines on white space. Our minds are equipped with a faculty called symbolism. Using this faculty, we understand that these characters (M-A-N) symbolize letters, and letters come together to form words, and words symbolize truths. Mentally we move through these layers quickly due to much practice and familiarity. But for a child learning to read, or learning the letters of the alphabet, its not so easy.

Again, God spoke forth creation; therefore all of the universe is constructed with words, or symbols. The Bible then teaches us the language of God; it translates His truths. The more fluent we are in Gods Word, the more we will sense the larger reality that nature expresses, and the more swiftly we will move through the levels of meaning. 

Now secular science does not recognize God, so it does not recognize the universe as a spoken language. As a result, it sees objects, not symbols. And here is the outcome: secular scientists study the image above and say, “Okay, we observe a form that looks like this: M. We observe another form like this: A. We observe another form like this: N. These forms maintain a certain order, and we do see similarities. We conclude that the N used to be an A, and the A used to be an M. The space in which they exist accidentally came together over billions of years.” They then develop a whole library of textbooks that classify and label every aspect of M-A-N without realizing that, while their observations are correct, their conclusions are illiterate.

Spiritualists go a step farther. They study the image M-A-N and recognize there is a layer of symbolism and purpose. They say, “It’s a word. Those are symbols. This is an expression of meaning.” However correct they may be in this regard, if these spiritualists do not know Gods Word, they will inevitably misinterpret the meaning. Ask them what M-A-N means and theyll point to a head of lettuce, or a doghouse, or a ceiling fan. And so in this way, they observe the universe has symbolism and purpose, but they misread the language and base their lives on false interpretations. 

For this very reason Gods Word is so important! It translates His truths; it lets us in to the reality His language is communicating. While the universe reveals what the Creator spoke, the Bible reveals what the Creator meant. The universe is a spoken language rich with symbolism, yes; but without Gods Word, our interpretations are either erroneous or illiterate. We need the Word of God in our lives if we seek to know the true meaning of that which we observe. Even more, we need to know Gods Word if we intend to engage the world properly, for that is how we dialogue with His creation.

The Man is a Tree of the Field


Born in 1884, Axel Erlandson was a horticultural genius. No figure in known history has been able to replicate the trees Axel grew in his garden. His daughter said that he could talk to them.

Axel had a fourth grade education. As it turns out, this may have been a blessing in that he was free to experiment without any preconceptions, allowing the trees themselves to act as his teacher.

Very guarded about his methods, he taught no one his “trade secrets.” As he said in 1953, “A number of people have asked me if there is any one else who can take up this work when I lay it down; but I know of no one that could be trained to continue after me in this occupation. So in a way it would appear that I've learned a kind of profession so late in life that I cannot carry it to its ultimate possible attainment.”


Although Axel passed away in 1964, his “circus trees” live on in Gilroy, California. Unfortunately only a fraction of the original 70 are left.

It makes you wonder, though, why is a tree such as it is? Axel’s trees only seem odd to us because we’re familiar with God’s design. And surely God invested more genius into His design than Axel could have afforded. So why did God design the tree such as He did? Why not some other way?

To answer this, we need to sidestep into a deeper conversation. The following passage is lifted from Rabbi Akiva Tatz’s book, WorldMask. He writes:

All the world is an analogy for a higher reality. Each detail of the world teaches something about its source in the spiritual world; each detail here is an exact parallel of that which exists there. This is perfectly logical: if we were commanded to study and understand the spiritual realm and yet had no avenue of access to that understanding, what would be the sense of such a command? The pathway to deeper insight is clear: we are in fact enjoined to see more deeply, to look into those depths that cannot be seen by human eyes, and the access comes by way of a close and sensitive study of that which is revealed. 

Just as a person observes the physical body of his friend in order to relate to the person or the inner being of that friend, so too we study the structure and movements of the physical world in order to perceive its root. The truth is that there is no other way; a person never sees the inner being or neshama of another person. We simply have no sense-organ which can directly perceive a soul. All we can do is observe the person’s bodily expression sensitively and we automatically gain insight into who they are. Subtle movements of the body, a subtle flicker of expression on the face, an almost imperceptible smile or motion of acceptance, the slightest gesture of tension or relaxation in bodily posture––all of these speak worlds. 

In relating to people, that switch from outer body to inner person is achieved effortlessly: when relating intensely to another person one is usually unaware of the interface provided by the body. One simply perceives the inner reality as if directly. This natural ability to use the medium of the body to see its core is itself a Divine gift which teaches us that such a perception can be achieved. The challenge is to use the entire world in this way. All aspects of the physical world should be engaged and studied for what they reveal about their Creator. 

This is a remarkable and inspiring view of the world: every object and phenomenon it contains is a Divine lesson, a parable relating to the Creator.

Akiva Tatz, WorldMask: The World Parallels Its Root, pg. 62-63

Paul would agree; he says it this way: “For since the creation of the world, God’s invisible qualities––his eternal power and divine nature––have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made” (Romans 1:20 NIV).

Invisible, eternal, divine: these are characteristics of the heavenly realm, the “higher reality” as Tatz calls it. These qualities can be seen clearly in the lower world. This is because all physical truth emanates from the spiritual domain. The natural world is the way it is because each component is a parable relating to the Creator who spoke it forth.

With this understanding in mind, we return our focus to the tree. In the Bible, God is never compared to a tree, but men often are. In fact, Deuteronomy comes right out and says that the man is a tree of the field. “When thou shalt besiege a city a long time, in making war against it to take it, thou shalt not destroy the trees thereof by forcing an axe against them: for thou mayest eat of them, and thou shalt not cut them down (for the tree of the field is man's life) to employ them in the siege...” (Deuteronomy 20:19 NKJ) Of note, you will see this verse translated a great many ways. Translators struggle to make sense of the phrase I’ve italicized. The pulpit commentary on Biblehub.com states, “As the words stand in the text, they can only be rendered thus: ‘For the man is a tree of the field.’ This gives no good sense, or indeed, any sense at all; and hence it is proposed to alter the reading of the text so as to produce a meaning that shall be acceptable.” This is referring to the fact that translators alter the reading of the text to produce something they find acceptable. As a result, our translations vary. For instance, in the New King James version (quoted above), translators put the phrase in parenthesis, and they add the word “life” although it is not found in the Hebrew. Other versions try different maneuvers to make it acceptable. If, however, we accept the Hebrew as it’s written, the verse says that the man is a tree of the field. “Kiy ha’adam etz ha’sadeh” - For the man is a tree of the field. 

This connection between man and trees brings out a new dimension in Mark 8. “[Jesus] took the blind man by the hand and led him out of the village, and when he had spit on his eyes and laid his hands on him, he asked him, “Do you see anything?” And he looked up and said, “I see people, but they look like trees, walking.” Then Jesus laid his hands on his eyes again; and he opened his eyes, his sight was restored, and he saw everything clearly.” (Mark 8-23-25 ESV)

Some interpret this to mean Jesus heals in stages. I would agree. When the blind man saw people as trees walking around, he was seeing into the spiritual essence of those people. When Jesus touched the man again, the man began to see what we see physically. The meaning of the passage, then, is that restoration can come first spiritually and then physically. These are the stages in which Jesus often brings healing.

The Bible opens up another depth. The tree is related to a man of righteousness. Psalm 92:12: “The righteous will flourish like a palm tree; they will grow like a cedar of Lebanon.” Proverbs 11:28: “Those who trust in their riches will fall, but the righteous will thrive like a green leaf.” Psalm 1:3 shares this insight: “[A righteous man] will be like a tree firmly planted by streams of water, which yields its fruit in its season and its leaf does not wither; and in whatever he does, he prospers.” Jeremiah 17:8 says likewise, that “the man who trusts in the Lord will be like a tree that extends its roots by a stream and will not fear when the heat comes.” Suffice to say, when we analyze a tree and its design, we learn about the qualities of a righteous man. Consider the following...

A tree has depth before it has stature. A tree is fed by the light of the world. A tree focuses not on producing fruit, but on growing closer to the world above; its fruit is a natural offshoot of this growth. A tree is a purifying agent; it absorbs harmful carbon dioxide and transforms it into life-giving oxygen. A tree has a seen part and an unseen part: we interact with the seen part, but its life is derived from the unseen part. The unseen part sustains it: the deeper its connection to the unseen world, the stronger a storm it can withstand. A tree goes through seasons: when the environment is conducive to growth, it invests its energy in many directions and its endeavors take on color. When the environment isn’t as friendly, the tree slows down; it prioritizes, sheds the excesses and shifts its energy toward the enduring portion (its center). A tree is altruistic. A tree naturally grows in community with other trees. In such a community, trees network and work together; their roots interconnect. They give voice to the wind (“wind” and “spirit are the same word in Hebrew). It’s been said that God’s Sacred Name, Y-H-V-H, is pronounced by the whisper of the wind as it passes through trees: Y____H____W____H

A sensitive study of the tree will yield even more insights into what it means to be a person of righteousness. The attributes of one are the distinguishing marks of the other. So to answer the question we started with (why is a tree’s design such as it is?), the answer is because it shares the essence of a man, a righteous man. Although their physical interface is quite different, the truths that make them what they are are the same. Those truths are more primary than the externalities. 

Stepping back, I think we will have to wait on Heaven before we grasp at its depth this connection between trees and man. In Heaven, we’ll have an entire eternity to unpack the deeper meaning of God’s brilliant designs. You know, Axel Erlandson may have taken his greatest secrets to the grave, but God saves His greatest secrets until the grave.

Light and Stone

Moses turned and went down from the mountain with the two tablets of the testimony in his hand, tablets that were written on both sides; on the front and on the back they were written. The tablets were the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God, engraved on the tablets. (Exodus 35:15-16)

The two tablets were inscribed by the finger of God. God engraved His commandments “on both sides; on the front and on the back they were written.” Quoting the ancient Jewish sources, prominent rabbi Dr. Akiva Tatz brings out a wonderful dimension about this, and I believe it because it makes too much sense to disregard.

Rabbi Tatz says that God’s handwriting went in through the front and all the way out through the back. This is why there was writing on both sides of each tablet. It's not like a piece of paper where God ran out of room at the bottom so He had to flip it over and continue on the back. That thinking totally misses the point! Rather, the depth of the inscription was such that it pierced the entire width of the stone. If Moses held up a tablet to read it, he would see daylight from the other side coming through each letter. Essentially, the commandments themselves were light! 

Hold on to this thought as we consider our Savior, Jesus Christ. He is the light of the world, the true light who gives light to every man. At His crucifixion, His body was nailed to a cross. Each nail went in through the front and all the way out through the back. 

If we put the two images together, we see that, with regards to the ten commandments, light was driven through stone material. The eternal pressed into the finite. With regards to our Messiah, stone material was driven through Light. The finite pressed into the eternal.

Nature's Menorah

Do you see the menorah pattern?


As above, so below. The lower world reflects the higher world.

Taking a Thought Captive

“We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.” (2 Corinthians 10:5)

Can the Torah help us understand what it means to take a thought captive?

Yes. Deuteronomy 21 details the procedure as to how to take one captive. It goes as follows:

When you go out to war against your enemies, and the Lord your God gives them into your hand and you take them captive, and you see among the captives a woman of beautiful form, and you desire to take her to be your wife, and you bring her home to your house, she shall shave her head and cut her nails. And she shall take off the clothes in which she was captured and shall remain in your house and lament her father and her mother a full month. After that you may go in to her and be her husband, and she shall be your wife. But if you no longer delight in her, you shall let her go where she wants. But you shall not sell her for money, nor shall you treat her as a slave, since you have humiliated her. (Deuteronomy 21:10-14)

Reading this, we must first understand that, in the ancient world, often women taken captive after battle would succumb to the evils of sex slavery. The Torah, however, prohibits such evil. Speaking to the men of Israel, the Torah is emphatic: after a month of caring for her in your house, you either marry her (thereby endowing her with full marital rights), or you let her go free wherever she wants. You can’t sell her for money, and you can’t treat her as a slave. Regarding the phrase “you have humiliated her...” this is humiliation in the sense that you’ve shaved her head and diminished her beauty. This is not humiliation in the sense that you’ve raped her. Read verse 13: it is only after a month of caring for her––and at the point you will marry her––that you are permitted to sleep with her. Although this may still sound harsh, consider, if you will, the alternative: men from Torahless nations would rape this woman right away and then sell her into slavery. What the Torah prescribes is a process which gives this woman a month of mourning for her family, a time of protection and adjustment, and then brings her into a relationship where she receives full marital rights.

But as Paul says, ALL Scripture is God-breathed, and profitable for our teaching, reproof, correction, and instruction in righteous.” How is this passage from Deuteronomy good for our teaching and instruction in righteous? Well, to answer this question, we have to return to the original language. And by doing so, we’ll also answer our original question.


In Hebrew, the word for “thought” is a feminine noun. At some level, what applies to taking a woman captive applies equally to taking a thought captive. 

For a moment pretend you’re a bachelor in the ancient Israeli army. God has given you victory over an enemy territory. As you go along taking them captive, a woman of beautiful form unexpectedly catches your eye. You think to yourself, “Is this woman sent by God as a gift for me? If I ignore this, am I missing something God wants for my life? OR––is she a plant by the enemy? If I embrace her, will she be destructive in my life? As beautiful as she is, you genuinely don’t know if she is from God or from the enemy. So how do you decide?

Before you make any final decisions, God’s law prescribes a preliminary process. First, her head must be shaved (Paul refers to a woman’s hair as her glory). Next, she has to cut her fingernails (ie. remove what makes her dangerous to others). She must put on different clothes than those she was wearing when you first saw her. You must keep her in your house for a full month while she laments her father and mother.

As you can imagine, after some time it’s no longer a fleeting moment of attraction. In your house is a sad, hairless woman with puffy eyes and red cheeks that you have to care for all month long. You are beginning to rethink your decision. You are considering seriously your decision. Finally, a full month passes. You find yourself in a better position to decide if she is right for you and if you are right for her. If yes, then you can marry her and become one with her. Otherwise, you are to release her. 

Keep this in mind as you picture yourself in todays world. You’re going along and the thought occurs to you: “I want to quit my job and work elsewhere.” Or maybe the thought is, “I want to commit to a leadership position at church.” Any meaningful thought is applicable. Whatever your thought may be, you find it very attractive as you initially consider it. But you ask yourself, “Is this thought sent by God as a gift for me? If I ignore this, am I missing something God wants for my life? On the other hand, has this thought been planted by the enemy? And if I embrace it, will it be destructive in my life?" 

Before you wed this idea, you know the process:
 • stay with it––live with it––for one full month. During this time...
 • remove its glory and see it for what it really is
 • ask yourself, could this be harmful to me or to those around me in any way?
 • examine the idea in its least attractive form 
 • view it in a different context than when it first occurred to you
 • clue yourself into its true origin; what fostered this idea?
 • ensure that it is right for you and you are right for it

If, in the end, you have moved through the process with prayerful consideration, you may embrace it. 



Inspired by a teaching by Grant Luton, Beth Tikkun Messianic Fellowship

Sine Cera

I pray that your love may abound still more and more in knowledge and all discernment, that you may approve the things that are excellent, that you may be sincere and without offense until the day of Christ, being filled with the fruits of righteousness which are Jesus Christ, to the glory and praise of God. (Philippians 1:9)

My Bible comments on this verse:

"Sincere means genuine, and originally meant 'tested by sunlight.' In the ancient world, dishonest pottery dealers filled cracks in their inferior products with wax before glazing and painting them, making worthless pots difficult to distinguish from expensive ones. The only way to avoid being defrauded was to hold the pot to the sun, making the wax-filled cracks obvious. Fine pottery that could withstand 'sun testing' would be marked as sine cera––'without wax.'"

The Menorah: God's Pattern for Giving Light

Exodus 25:9
[God speaking] “Make this tabernacle and all its furnishings exactly like the pattern I will show you.”

Hebrews 8:5
They serve at a sanctuary that is a copy and shadow of what is in heaven. This is why Moses was warned when he was about to build the tabernacle: “See to it that you make everything according to the pattern shown you on the mountain.”


Exodus 25:31-33, 36-37, 40
“You shall make a lampstand of pure gold. The lampstand shall be made of hammered work: its base, its stem, its cups, its calyxes, and its flowers shall be of one piece with it. And there shall be six branches going out of its sides, three branches of the lampstand out of one side of it and three branches of the lampstand out of the other side of it; three cups made like almond blossoms, each with calyx and flower, on one branch, and three cups made like almond blossoms, each with calyx and flower, on the other branch—so for the six branches going out of the lampstand...Their calyxes and their branches shall be of one piece with it, the whole of it a single piece of hammered work of pure gold. You shall make seven lamps for it. And the lamps shall be set up so as to give light on the space in front of it... And see that you make them after the pattern for them, which is being shown you on the mountain.”



The menorah is not a man-made invention! Its shape, its unique design, was revealed to Moses by God Himself; it is a shadow of what Moses was shown in Heaven. Moses (via Bezaleel) simply duplicated the thing he saw, and at God’s instruction, it became the Tabernacle’s source of light within the Holy Place. Note! The menorah is God’s pattern for giving light. Again, the menorah is God’s pattern for giving light. Spiritual truth is light, so whenever we––as tabernacles of God’s Spirit––welcome spiritual truth into our life, it’s important that we measure it against the pattern of the menorah.

Notice, there are arms branching off in opposite directions. The arms on one side are identical to those on the other side. The right is exactly the same as the left. And yet, they’re exactly the opposite! It's kind of like a pair of shoes: is your left shoe the same as your right shoe? Yes! Is your left shoe the opposite of your right shoe? Again, yes! They are the same and the opposite at once. This is a characteristic that defines the menorah––that something can be the same and the opposite at the same time. It's not a paradox; it's a matter of symmetry. 

Also notice, the arms are held together by a central stalk that not only distributes the weight perfectly, it actually connects the branches and unifies the structure. Balance and unity are achieved through the central stalk. Who acts as the central stalk of the Bible? Jesus! In fact, He's the central stalk of the first verse in the Bible! Being the Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the End, we find in the middle of Genesis 1:1 a two-letter word spelled aleph+tov, the first and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet:



The importance of the menorah cannot be overstated. When I hear certain groups argue two opposing truths, I can’t help but think they are playing checkers while God is playing chess. Each group is 100% correct, but representing only half of the whole. As a result, this group struggles to hold up their side, and the other group struggles to hold up their side, but if both groups would stand back and accept the two truths together, each group would at last experience rest! Because the matter as a whole will stand alone. Again, God’s pattern for giving light is the menorah, and spiritual truth is light. Thus truth is properly measured in terms of the menorah. Some examples that come to mind are free-will and predestination; young earth and old earth; mercy and judgment; rights and obligations. These Scriptural truths appear to oppose one another, when actually they are balancing sides that shine light on each other. 

Here is a wonderful menorah: 
Solomon says, “Consider the ant you sluggard! Observe its ways and be wise. Having no chief, officer or ruler, it prepares its food in the summer and gathers its provision in the harvest” (Proverbs 6:6-8). 

Jesus says, “Consider the ravens: they neither sow nor reap, they have neither storehouse nor barn, and yet God feeds them...Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow. They neither toil nor spin yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not dressed as beautifully as they are” (Luke 12:24-27). 

These passages are the same in that they both ask us to consider something in nature for our own benefit. Both teach principles meant to bring comfort: the ant finds comfort in its working ahead; the ravens and lilies find comfort in their total reliance on God. These passages, though, seem to contradict. Ants are self-reliant, without a ruler, hard working, and toiling for tomorrow. Ravens and lilies are dependent on their ruler, not concerned with toil, and not troubled about tomorrow. So which passage do we abide by? Both! They come together to form a menorah. A person’s life will find balance when both truths are exercised fully. I’m not saying this will be easy either.

Balancing truth is often not easy. Building a menorah into one's life or understanding takes time. Notice how it is constructed. Exodus 25:31 & 36: You shall make a menorah of pure gold. The menorah shall be made of hammered work: its base, its stem, its cups, its calyxes, and its flowers shall be of one piece with it...The whole of it a single piece of hammered work of pure gold. The menorah, being a picture of truth, is a hammered work! It is not arrived at quickly. Rather it is formed slowly, with one swing of the hammer after another. Compare this process to the creation of the golden calf. The golden calf was created in one afternoon. It was quick and easy; not a lot of work was required. The truths of idolatry are always quick and easy. But to build a balanced menorah, with all of its components and details, is quite the opposite. It requires a skilled eye and a disciplined hand. It requires study. Imagine the craftsman hammering into a solid piece of gold once, twice, thrice, then stepping back and studying it. Stepping forward again: hammering here, hammering there, then stepping back and studying it. Like Michelangelo said of the slab of marble, “I chip away everything that doesn’t look like David.” The student of truth must chip away everything that doesn’t look like God’s Word. 

Suffice to say, the menorah is more than a mere candlestick. It is a replica of something that is in Heaven as we speak. It is not intrinsically Jewish just as Heaven is not intrinsically Jewish. The menorah is the design of all spiritual truth. It is God’s pattern for giving light. All spiritual truth ought to be made to fit the pattern of the menorah before it is welcomed into our soul (as symbolized by the Holy Place). Only then do we experience a full amount of light, and enjoy the balance and rest it has to offer.

Jonah and Peter

In Joppa, Jonah fled from his call to go to the Gentiles. He was overcome by a great fish. As a result, the Gentiles received the gift of God's forgiveness. (Jonah 1-4)

In Joppa, Peter son of Jonah (Matthew 16:17) accepted his call to go to the Gentiles. He overcame great prejudice. As a result, the Gentiles received the gift of the Holy Spirit. (Acts 10)

Solomon's Trio

King Solomon contributed three books to the Bible: Ecclesiastes, Proverbs, and Song of Solomon. These books can be understood as a message that speaks to the body, soul, and spirit.


Ecclesiastes takes aim at your body as it deals with the flesh. 

Proverbs speaks to the mind, will, and emotions (aka. soul). 

Song of Solomon is a love letter to the spirit. It operates as the spirit does––multidimensional and hard to pin down. Is it talking about agriculture? Yes. But wait, it is talking about the love that a man feels for his bride. But wait, no, it is talking about the love God feels for His Bride. Multidimensional. 

Left and Right in Scripture

To Hellenistic thinkers like you and me, left means left and right means right. But left and right assume more meaning than a straightforward definition in Hebraic thought. In Hebraic thought, the right represents the spiritual and the left represents the physical. It’s not a morality thing like good vs evil, or right vs wrong. It simply addresses two realms: the right side connotes the spiritual and the left side connotes the physical. Throughout the centuries this dynamic has been a standard element in Jewish thinking; you will see it employed often in their writings. Here are some examples from the Bible:

• Ecclesiastes 10:2––Solomon writes, The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of a fool inclines to the left. What he’s saying here is that a wise man concerns himself with spiritual matters, whereas a fool centers his heart on physical, temporal things.

• Matthew 6:3––Jesus speaking: “But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing.” In other words, you shouldn’t let your flesh get in the way of what you’re trying to accomplish spiritually.

• At the ordination of a Levitical priest, blood from a ram is dabbled on the man’s right ear lobe, right thumb, and right big toe (Leviticus 8:24). This symbolizes his spiritual anointing.

• The left hand of God is never mentioned. Only His right hand is. This is because God is spirit. (John 4:24)

• John 21:6––Jesus said, “Throw your net on the right side of the boat and you will find some.” When they did, they were unable to haul the net in because of the large number of fish. This historical event doubles as a parable. Before these men became disciples, they worked as fishermen catching fish. Because of their encounter with Christ, their very nature had been altered, and now fishing for mere fish seemed empty. So Jesus called out to them, saying cast your nets on the spiritual side. Catch spiritual fish. And boy did they! They took up a new direction; they shifted their efforts to the right side and became fishers of men. Today the international symbol for a Christian is a fish, so spiritually speaking, those nets are still filling up.

• Joshua 1:7––God spoke to Joshua saying, “...Be careful to do according to all the Torah which Moses my servant commanded you; do not turn from it to the right or to the left, so that you may have success wherever you go.” Don’t drift toward the right: don’t take God’s commandments and spiritualize them into nice thoughts that don’t have any practical application. Conversely, don’t drift toward the left and burden yourself under heavy physical requirements. 

• In the Temple, when animals are brought forward for sacrifice, their death occurs on the north side of the courtyard. God, sitting on the Mercy Seat in the Holy of Holies, faces eastward. Therefore, the north side of the courtyard is on His left. This makes sense, because when a life is given to God, it's only on the physical side that death takes place.

• In the Hebrew language, sentences begin on the right and end on the left. So when you write or read a sentence in Hebrew, your focus moves across the page in a direction that reminds you that all things begin in the spiritual and emanate to the physical. 

• John 18:10-11––Then Simon Peter, who had a sword, drew it and struck the high priest's servant, cutting off his right ear. (The servant's name was Malchus.) So Jesus said to Peter, "Put the sword into the sheath..."  This moment takes place in the Garden of Gethsemane when they come to arrest Jesus. As it says, Peter pulls out his sword and cuts off Malchus' right ear, thereby disqualifying Malchus from serving in the Temple (Leviticus 21:18). Jesus tells Peter to put the sword away; He then touches Malchus' ear and heals it. Now the sword Jesus wants his disciples to use is NOT the sword at their side. He has taught them to use the sword of the Spirit, not the sword at their side. Peter was using the wrong kind of sword. The lesson is, when we defend Jesus in a fleshly way, we severe the spiritual hearing of our audience. 

• In 1 Samuel 11, we encounter an adversary of Israel: General Nachash of the Ammonites. (Nachash, in Hebrew, means “serpent.” His name is literally General Serpent.) Nachash offers the people of Israel a treaty on one condition: “that I gouge out all your right eyes...” he says to them. The serpent, the enemy of our soul, would offer peace to you and me on the same terms, by submitting to him and becoming spiritually blind. Think about it. If a person views the world solely through the eyes of the flesh, the person poses no threat to the enemy. But if one can perceive the world through the eyes of the Spirit, then one poses a huge threat to the enemy! This is why Nachash demands the right eye’s removal.

Again, the right is the side of the spiritual and the left is the side of the physical. In this regard, there are other examples we could draw from in Scripture. For now let us end with Psalm 73:22-24: 

When my heart was embittered, and I was pierced in my heart, 
I was brutish and ignorant. 
I was like a beast before You. 
Yet I am continually with You. You hold my right hand. 
You guide me with Your counsel, and afterward You will take me into glory!