Discussing Torah matters because the Torah matters

Leviticus 19:18

Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbor as yourself. I am the LORD.


The difference between these has been explained as follows:

Revenge-seeking:
You ask your co-worker for a dollar. He says no. One week later, your co-worker asks you for a dollar. You say, “Absolutely not!”


Grudge-bearing:
You ask your co-worker for a dollar. He says no. One week later, your co-worker asks you for a dollar. You say, “Absolutely! I’m not you.”

Striking Down the Enemy

In the wilderness, the tempter came and said to Jesus, “If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.” 

Jesus answered the enemy with a verse from Deuteronomy: “It is written, ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God.’” (Quoting Deuteronomy 8:3)

The devil then took Him into Jerusalem and had Him stand on the pinnacle of the temple, and said to Him, “If you are the Son of God, throw yourself down...”

Jesus answered the enemy with a verse from Deuteronomy: “It is written, ‘You shall not put the Lord your God to the test.’” (Quoting Deuteronomy 6:16)

The enemy took Him to a very high mountain and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory, and said to Him, “All these things I will give You, if You fall down and worship me.”

Jesus answered the enemy with a verse from Deuteronomy: “It is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and serve Him only.” (Quoting Deuteronomy 6:13)

Jesus relied on the Torah to do battle with the devil. There are five books in the Torah He could have chosen from, but one was enough to put down the enemy.

When David went against Goliath, the account says that David “chose five smooth stones from the brook and put them in his shepherd’s pouch. His sling was in his hand, and he approached the Philistine. . .David ran quickly toward the battle line to meet the Philistine. David put his hand in his bag and took out a stone and slung it and struck the Philistine on his forehead. The stone sank into his forehead, and he fell on his face to the ground.” (1 Samuel 17:40,48,49)

David relied on these stones to do battle with Goliath. There were five stones in his bag he could have chosen from, but one was enough to put down the enemy. 

It’s interesting though, because the battle wasn’t quite finished for either David or Jesus. Luke 4:13 tells us that “when the devil had finished every temptation, he left Jesus until an opportune time.” This opportune time came later, when Jesus hung on the cross. Speaking through those passing by, Satan called out, “If you are the Son of God, come down from that cross!” This is the fourth great temptation that tends to be overlooked, but it goes to show that the showdown wasn’t quite over between Jesus and the tempter.

Neither was it over between David and Goliath. After dropping him with a stone, David stands over Goliath and draws Goliath’s sword out of its sheath. Using Goliath’s own instrument against him, David severs Goliath’s head from his body. 

Hanging on the cross, Jesus looks down at the enemy. Before this, He had struck down the devil with a book, but now Jesus will use something else to finalize the defeat. Death is taken up in the hands of Jesus. Using the devil’s own instrument against him, Jesus dies on the cross––and with that death, He crushes the serpent’s head.

Boiling Goats

Do not boil a young goat in its mother’s milk.

This law is repeated three times in the Torah: Exodus 23:19, Exodus 34:26, and Deuteronomy 14:21. The spiritual principle that shoulders this law is as follows:

A mother’s milk is designed to give life. It’s intended to nourish the young goat. If we boil the young goat in this milk, we are taking something that is meant for life but using it as a means for death. God’s law prohibits such a corruption. 

I remember my dad talking about a certain experience he went through at a large company he used to work for. He told me that higher management had devised a number system meant to measure and reward productive labor. The higher one’s numbers, the more bonus-eligible a worker would become. However, when this number system was implemented, an unexpected thing happened. Lower management noticed that my dad’s numbers were high, so they started to assign him the arduous jobs, one after another. Meanwhile, those workers who tended to slack off were consistently assigned the easiest jobs available. Lower management lessened the likelihood of headaches this way. The net effect, though, was that my dad was being punished for being productive.

Lower management failed to realize they were boiling a young goat in its mother’s milk. They were taking something meant for life (reward) and using it to bring death (hardship) to the vulnerable party. They were transgressing the principle that is expressed by this very relevant commandment.

No Oxen Required

We’ve established that the spiritual realm is primary, and the physical realm is secondary. As such, all physical truth has its source in the spiritual domain, that world from which God spoke forth physical creation. Let’s continue to develop this idea because once it clicked for me, the Torah opened up in so many ways. What I once saw as an irrelevant commandment related to agriculture became an eternal truth and a guiding principle as relevant and applicable to my life as to any ancient Israelite.  

Speaking of the Heavenly Father, Rabbi Akiva Tatz writes: “The Creator is completely transcendent, and utterly incorporeal. He has no body, no tangible aspect, and no parts. The problem, however, is that the Torah speaks of God as if He were physical. Many verses speak of God’s hand, His arm, His eyes, and many other such attributes. “With a mighty hand and an outstretched arm;” “The eyes of God...are upon it (the land of Israel). 

“At first glance it seems that the Torah speaks this way because we cannot understand any other method of expression; we can understand only those thing which are part of our world. We live in a finite, differentiated world; we are familiar with beings who have hands, eyes, and feet. Therefore the Torah speaks to us in terms which are familiar to us.  Of course, we understand that beyond the metaphor, beyond the borrowed language, there is much more. The finite words of Torah clothe endless layers of deeper meaning; the outer layer is only the vehicle, so to speak, for the deeper meaning. But since abstraction cannot be expressed except through concrete terms, the Torah speaks in those concrete terms which are familiar to us. 

“However, deeper thought will show that this cannot be correct. If the Torah is using human terms as analogy, we are faced with a major difficulty. How can the Torah speak in terms which are not strictly true? We know that the Torah is true in the very deepest sense possible; every nuance within the Torah must be true. Since the Torah is none other than God speaking, even the outermost layers of its expression must be absolutely accurate and true. Analogies and metaphors may be useful, but they are not true in themselves. . .If God does not really have a hand, but the Torah says He does because we are limited to familiar concepts, is this not in some sense inaccurate, or false? Is untruth justified because we cannot hear truth? Surely not!

“We shall need to seek more deeply. There is a more accurate answer to our question, and one who hears it will find his perception of reality forever changed. 

“How can God have a real hand? Surely a real hand is finite, physical––a contradiction to the infinite Oneness of the Creator? Surely the Divine hand must be some sort of analogy? But the secret which answers our question is this: God’s hand is a real hand and our human hand is an analogy! When the Torah talks of the Divine hand, it is referring to that which is real in the deepest sense; that which is infinite and in no contradiction to the absolute Oneness of the Creator. God indeed has a hand, but that hand transcends human understanding no less than any other Divine attribute which is expressed in Torah, and no less than what we refer to as God Himself. 

“So we can say that God has a hand, but we cannot understand what that means. And that is exactly the point: the reason that we have been created with hands is so that we can begin to understand! We possess parts, components, differentiated aspects of our bodies so that we can begin to fathom the meaning of these things at their root. We are the analogy! God wants us to begin to understand Him; part of the purpose of learning Torah is to begin to understand what a human can understand of the Divine; and therefore we are given the tangible tools that we need.”


So look at your hand. In one sense, that is not a hand. That is an illustration of what God wants you to think about whenever He talks about His hand! Because “we are the analogy.” This is the point Rabbi Tatz is making, and it’s an amazing thing to consider! 

It’s been explained to me this way: Imagine you’re an Israelite in ancient Israel. You’re walking down the road and you see that your neighbor’s oxen are stuck in a ditch. You think to yourself, “Okay, God handed down His Word to teach me how to respond to this real life situation. I need to help my neighbor’s oxen out of the ditch.” Yes, this is true; but to some degree, this is upside-down thinking. Actually, God handed down the situation so that you would be able to understand His Word! The oxen, the cart, the neighbor, the ditch––God needed all of these aspects to teach you the eternal reality that He really wanted you to know! Love. Patience. Kindness. Goodness. Real things. Spiritual things. Primary things. The situation was merely a parable. 

As I mentioned earlier, what I once saw as an irrelevant commandment related to agriculture became an eternal truth and a guiding principle as relevant and applicable to my life as to any ancient Israelite. I just had to realize that God, on one level, created this world as a parable to teach us about the world to come. So if we encounter a commandment in the Torah and sense no deeper meaning, then we’ve missed it. It’s like Jesus said of those who didn’t understand His parables: “Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand.” The same can be said of those who toss aside God’s directives thinking they are irrelevant to modern life.

Take for instance this commandment: “Do not muzzle an ox while it is treading out the grain.” A person today may read this and think, “Well I don’t own an ox, so this commandment doesn’t apply to me.” But stop and consider it as a parable, as an analogy expressing higher truth. Paul does exactly this, saying: “The elders who rule well are to be considered worthy of double honor, especially those who work hard at preaching and teaching, for Scripture says ‘You shall not muzzle the ox while it is threshing’” (1 Timothy 5:17-18). Paul gets the parable. He understands its meaning. It’s about more than an ox. God uses the ox and the grain and the treading to communicate a spiritual principle: those who work for you deserve in return some of the blessing derived from their efforts. Once you understand that this is what it is all about, you realize there are endless applications for this commandment in today’s modern life––no oxen required. It applies to you even if you do not own an ox.

Any yet, the oxen were required to communicate the real part. That is, the truth.

Nature as a Language

God could’ve willed the universe into existence. But as you know, He didn’t.
Genesis 1 is clear: He created the universe with words. He spoke forth creation.
As speaking beings made in God’s image, we comprehend words. Words are symbols. 

It goes that we can engage the natural world as a language once we realize that everything in it is a symbol communicating deeper truth, a construct harboring inner meaning. 

For a second, take a look at the following image and tell me, what is this?


Did you say it’s a combination of black lines on white space? 
Did you say it’s a three-letter word with two consonants and a vowel?
Or did you say it’s a person who walks and talks and fails to put the toilet seat down?

It’s all three! And this is what’s so fascinating about language. We can extract levels of meaning from something that is physically no more than a combination of black lines on white space. Our minds are equipped with a faculty called symbolism. Using this faculty, we understand that these characters (M-A-N) symbolize letters, and letters come together to form words, and words symbolize truths. Mentally we move through these layers quickly due to much practice and familiarity. But for a child learning to read, or learning the letters of the alphabet, it’s not so easy.

Again, God spoke forth creation; therefore all of the universe is constructed with words, or symbols. The Bible then teaches us the language of God; it translates His truths. The more fluent we are in God’s Word, the more we will sense the larger reality that nature expresses, and the more swiftly we will move through the levels of meaning. 

Now secular science does not recognize God, so it does not recognize the universe as a spoken language. As a result, it sees objects, not symbols. And here is the outcome: secular scientists study the image above and say, “Okay, we observe a form that looks like this: M. We observe another form like this: A. We observe another form like this: N. These forms maintain a certain order, and we do see similarities. We conclude that the N used to be an A, and the A used to be an M. The space in which they exist accidentally came together over billions of years.” They then develop a whole library of textbooks that classify and label every aspect of M-A-N without realizing that, while their observations are correct, their conclusions are illiterate.

Spiritualists go a step farther. They study the image M-A-N and recognize there is a layer of symbolism and purpose. They say, “It’s a word. Those are symbols. This is an expression of meaning.” However correct they may be in this regard, if these spiritualists do not know God’s Word, they will inevitably misinterpret the meaning. Ask them what M-A-N means and they’ll point to a head of lettuce, or a doghouse, or a ceiling fan. And so in this way, they observe the universe has symbolism and purpose, but they misread the language and base their lives on false interpretations. 

For this very reason God’s Word is so important! It translates His truths; it lets us in to the reality His language is communicating. While the universe reveals what the Creator spoke, the Bible reveals what the Creator meant. The universe is a spoken language rich with symbolism, yes; but without God’s Word, our interpretations are either erroneous or illiterate. We need the Word of God in our lives if we seek to know the true meaning of that which we observe. Even more, we need to know God’s Word if we intend to engage the world properly, for that is how we dialogue with His creation.

The Man is a Tree of the Field


Born in 1884, Axel Erlandson was a horticultural genius. No figure in known history has been able to replicate the trees Axel grew in his garden. His daughter said that he could talk to them.

Axel had a fourth grade education. As it turns out, this may have been a blessing in that he was free to experiment without any preconceptions, allowing the trees themselves to act as his teacher.

Very guarded about his methods, he taught no one his “trade secrets.” As he said in 1953, “A number of people have asked me if there is any one else who can take up this work when I lay it down; but I know of no one that could be trained to continue after me in this occupation. So in a way it would appear that I've learned a kind of profession so late in life that I cannot carry it to its ultimate possible attainment.”


Although Axel passed away in 1964, his “circus trees” live on in Gilroy, California. Unfortunately only a fraction of the original 70 are left.

It makes you wonder, though, why is a tree such as it is? Axel’s trees only seem odd to us because we’re familiar with God’s design. And surely God invested more genius into His design than Axel could have afforded. So why did God design the tree such as He did? Why not some other way?

To answer this, we need to sidestep into a deeper conversation. The following passage is lifted from Rabbi Akiva Tatz’s book, WorldMask. He writes:

All the world is an analogy for a higher reality. Each detail of the world teaches something about its source in the spiritual world; each detail here is an exact parallel of that which exists there. This is perfectly logical: if we were commanded to study and understand the spiritual realm and yet had no avenue of access to that understanding, what would be the sense of such a command? The pathway to deeper insight is clear: we are in fact enjoined to see more deeply, to look into those depths that cannot be seen by human eyes, and the access comes by way of a close and sensitive study of that which is revealed. 

Just as a person observes the physical body of his friend in order to relate to the person or the inner being of that friend, so too we study the structure and movements of the physical world in order to perceive its root. The truth is that there is no other way; a person never sees the inner being or neshama of another person. We simply have no sense-organ which can directly perceive a soul. All we can do is observe the person’s bodily expression sensitively and we automatically gain insight into who they are. Subtle movements of the body, a subtle flicker of expression on the face, an almost imperceptible smile or motion of acceptance, the slightest gesture of tension or relaxation in bodily posture––all of these speak worlds. 

In relating to people, that switch from outer body to inner person is achieved effortlessly: when relating intensely to another person one is usually unaware of the interface provided by the body. One simply perceives the inner reality as if directly. This natural ability to use the medium of the body to see its core is itself a Divine gift which teaches us that such a perception can be achieved. The challenge is to use the entire world in this way. All aspects of the physical world should be engaged and studied for what they reveal about their Creator. 

This is a remarkable and inspiring view of the world: every object and phenomenon it contains is a Divine lesson, a parable relating to the Creator.

Akiva Tatz, WorldMask: The World Parallels Its Root, pg. 62-63

Paul would agree; he says it this way: “For since the creation of the world, God’s invisible qualities––his eternal power and divine nature––have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made” (Romans 1:20 NIV).

Invisible, eternal, divine: these are characteristics of the heavenly realm, the “higher reality” as Tatz calls it. These qualities can be seen clearly in the lower world. This is because all physical truth emanates from the spiritual domain. The natural world is the way it is because each component is a parable relating to the Creator who spoke it forth.

With this understanding in mind, we return our focus to the tree. In the Bible, God is never compared to a tree, but men often are. In fact, Deuteronomy comes right out and says that the man is a tree of the field. “When thou shalt besiege a city a long time, in making war against it to take it, thou shalt not destroy the trees thereof by forcing an axe against them: for thou mayest eat of them, and thou shalt not cut them down (for the tree of the field is man's life) to employ them in the siege...” (Deuteronomy 20:19 NKJ) Of note, you will see this verse translated a great many ways. Translators struggle to make sense of the phrase I’ve italicized. The pulpit commentary on Biblehub.com states, “As the words stand in the text, they can only be rendered thus: ‘For the man is a tree of the field.’ This gives no good sense, or indeed, any sense at all; and hence it is proposed to alter the reading of the text so as to produce a meaning that shall be acceptable.” This is referring to the fact that translators alter the reading of the text to produce something they find acceptable. As a result, our translations vary. For instance, in the New King James version (quoted above), translators put the phrase in parenthesis, and they add the word “life” although it is not found in the Hebrew. Other versions try different maneuvers to make it acceptable. If, however, we accept the Hebrew as it’s written, the verse says that the man is a tree of the field. “Kiy ha’adam etz ha’sadeh” - For the man is a tree of the field. 

This connection between man and trees brings out a new dimension in Mark 8. “[Jesus] took the blind man by the hand and led him out of the village, and when he had spit on his eyes and laid his hands on him, he asked him, “Do you see anything?” And he looked up and said, “I see people, but they look like trees, walking.” Then Jesus laid his hands on his eyes again; and he opened his eyes, his sight was restored, and he saw everything clearly.” (Mark 8-23-25 ESV)

Some interpret this to mean Jesus heals in stages. I would agree. When the blind man saw people as trees walking around, he was seeing into the spiritual essence of those people. When Jesus touched the man again, the man began to see what we see physically. The meaning of the passage, then, is that restoration can come first spiritually and then physically. These are the stages in which Jesus often brings healing.

The Bible opens up another depth. The tree is related to a man of righteousness. Psalm 92:12: “The righteous will flourish like a palm tree; they will grow like a cedar of Lebanon.” Proverbs 11:28: “Those who trust in their riches will fall, but the righteous will thrive like a green leaf.” Psalm 1:3 shares this insight: “[A righteous man] will be like a tree firmly planted by streams of water, which yields its fruit in its season and its leaf does not wither; and in whatever he does, he prospers.” Jeremiah 17:8 says likewise, that “the man who trusts in the Lord will be like a tree that extends its roots by a stream and will not fear when the heat comes.” Suffice to say, when we analyze a tree and its design, we learn about the qualities of a righteous man. Consider the following...

A tree has depth before it has stature. A tree is fed by the light of the world. A tree focuses not on producing fruit, but on growing closer to the world above; its fruit is a natural offshoot of this growth. A tree is a purifying agent; it absorbs harmful carbon dioxide and transforms it into life-giving oxygen. A tree has a seen part and an unseen part: we interact with the seen part, but its life is derived from the unseen part. The unseen part sustains it: the deeper its connection to the unseen world, the stronger a storm it can withstand. A tree goes through seasons: when the environment is conducive to growth, it invests its energy in many directions and its endeavors take on color. When the environment isn’t as friendly, the tree slows down; it prioritizes, sheds the excesses and shifts its energy toward the enduring portion (its center). A tree is altruistic. A tree naturally grows in community with other trees. In such a community, trees network and work together; their roots interconnect. They give voice to the wind (“wind” and “spirit” are the same word in Hebrew). It’s been said that God’s Sacred Name, Y-H-V-H, is pronounced by the whisper of the wind as it passes through trees: Y____H____W____H. 

A sensitive study of the tree will yield even more insights into what it means to be a person of righteousness. The attributes of one are the distinguishing marks of the other. So to answer the question we started with (why is a tree’s design such as it is?), the answer is because it shares the essence of a man, a righteous man. Although their physical interface is quite different, the truths that make them what they are are the same. Those truths are more primary than the externalities. 

Stepping back, I think we will have to wait on Heaven before we grasp at its depth this connection between trees and man. In Heaven, we’ll have an entire eternity to unpack the deeper meaning of God’s brilliant designs. You know, Axel Erlandson may have taken his greatest secrets to the grave, but God saves His greatest secrets until the grave.

Light and Stone

Moses turned and went down from the mountain with the two tablets of the testimony in his hand, tablets that were written on both sides; on the front and on the back they were written. The tablets were the work of God, and the writing was the writing of God, engraved on the tablets. (Exodus 35:15-16)

The two tablets were inscribed by the finger of God. God engraved His commandments “on both sides; on the front and on the back they were written.” Quoting the ancient Jewish sources, prominent rabbi Dr. Akiva Tatz brings out a wonderful dimension about this, and I believe it because it makes too much sense to disregard.

Rabbi Tatz says that God’s handwriting went in through the front and all the way out through the back. This is why there was writing on both sides of each tablet. It's not like a piece of paper where God ran out of room at the bottom so He had to flip it over and continue on the back. That thinking totally misses the point! Rather, the depth of the inscription was such that it pierced the entire width of the stone. If Moses held up a tablet to read it, he would see daylight from the other side coming through each letter. Essentially, the commandments themselves were light! 

Hold on to this thought as we consider our Savior, Jesus Christ. He is the light of the world, the true light who gives light to every man. At His crucifixion, His body was nailed to a cross. Each nail went in through the front and all the way out through the back. 

If we put the two images together, we see that, with regards to the ten commandments, light was driven through stone material. The eternal pressed into the finite. With regards to our Messiah, stone material was driven through Light. The finite pressed into the eternal.

Nature's Menorah

Do you see the menorah pattern?


As above, so below. The lower world reflects the higher world.